Files
chanora/docs/verification/verification-master-plan.md

6.9 KiB

Chanora Verification Master Plan

Document status: DV meeting baseline candidate
Date: 2026-05-29
Applies to: Chanora 0.2.0-beta.1 workspace / v1.0.0-rc.1 release-candidate evidence
Primary upstream documents: docs/sysrs.md, docs/sysdes.md, docs/srs.md, docs/architecture/sad.md, docs/architecture/sdd.md, docs/implementation-status-2026-05-28.md

1. Purpose

This plan defines the verification evidence Chanora must present at the DV meeting. It does not approve release by itself. It gives reviewers a single route from requirements and design baselines to available tests, demos, audits, waivers, and release gates.

The DV meeting may approve the verification posture for continued internal candidate work if the open gates are accepted as explicit waivers. Public or store release remains blocked until the release-readiness record reaches Go.

2. Verification Lifecycle Mapping

Lifecycle level Plan Primary input Verification focus
SWE.4 docs/verification/swe4-unit-verification-plan.md docs/architecture/sdd.md module behavior plus current crate and Flutter tests Unit behavior of reducers, protocol mappers, audio processors, storage, diagnostics, UI services, and utility logic
SWE.5 docs/verification/swe5-software-integration-verification-plan.md docs/architecture/sad.md component interfaces and docs/architecture/sdd.md module integration hooks Integration across Flutter, bridge, Rust core, protocol, audio, storage, diagnostics, resolver, and packaging boundaries
SWE.6 docs/verification/swe6-software-verification-plan.md docs/srs.md Integrated software verification against SRS, especially SRS-128 MVP acceptance
SYS.4 docs/verification/sys4-system-integration-verification-plan.md docs/sysdes.md and external environment assumptions System integration with compatible servers, OS services, hardware, network, app stores, diagnostics, and release operations

3. Verification Policy

Verification evidence shall be recorded as one of these states:

State Meaning DV handling
Passed Evidence exists and satisfies the stated criterion Accept as supporting evidence
Passed with limitation Evidence exists, but scope is narrower than final release scope Accept only with documented limitation
Not run Criterion is defined but no run is recorded for the candidate Requires waiver or follow-up action
Failed Evidence exists and does not satisfy the criterion Blocks the covered release scope unless waived by the release owner
Deferred Requirement is intentionally outside current candidate scope Requires requirement stage or waiver reference
Blocked External decision, platform access, legal sign-off, or environment prevents completion Requires owner and unblock condition

No document in this pack may convert an implementation gap into a pass. Gaps must be represented as Not run, Deferred, or Blocked.

4. Current Evidence Sources

Evidence source Current content DV use
.github/workflows/ci.yml Rust workspace check/test, advisory clippy, cargo-deny, cargo-about inventory check, Flutter analyze/test, unsigned iOS release build Build, unit, static-analysis, supply-chain, Flutter test, and iOS unsigned build evidence
.github/workflows/bench-advisory.yml Advisory-only realtime audio benchmark workflow for PR/push events Performance trend evidence, not a hard quality gate
docs/implementation-status-2026-05-28.md Current implementation status, blockers, partial areas, and P1/P2 gaps Primary readiness and waiver input
apps/chanora_flutter/test/ Flutter widget/service/e2e-labeled tests SWE.4/SWE.5/SWE.6 evidence depending on test type
Rust crate tests and benches Workspace tests plus audio benchmark harnesses SWE.4/SWE.5 performance and component evidence
tools/windows-smoke.md Windows source-build smoke procedure SYS.4/SWE.5 manual platform evidence when executed
docs/release/ios-build.md Unsigned iOS verification build note Release and platform build evidence

5. Entry Criteria for DV Review

Criterion Status Evidence
SysRS baseline available Met docs/sysrs.md
SysDes baseline available Met docs/sysdes.md
SRS baseline available Met docs/srs.md
SAD baseline available Met docs/architecture/sad.md
SDD baseline available Met docs/architecture/sdd.md
Verification plans available Met by this pack docs/verification/
Traceability summary available Met by this pack docs/governance/traceability-matrix.md
Release decision record available Met by this pack docs/release/release-readiness-go-nogo-record.md
Open gates represented as waivers or blockers Met by this pack docs/release/dv-waiver-register.md

6. Exit Criteria for DV Meeting

The DV meeting can pass the documentation baseline if reviewers agree that:

Exit criterion Required result
Requirements-to-verification route is reviewable SysRS/SysDes/SRS items map to verification plans and acceptance evidence
MVP acceptance criteria are explicit SysRS-241 through SysRS-257 appear in SWE.6 with evidence status
Verification scope is honest Known gaps are not marked as passed
Waivers are explicit Each release-affecting gap has owner, impact, mitigation, and unblock condition
Release recommendation is clear Current candidate is not represented as public-release-ready while DEC-012 and other gates remain open

7. Open Gates Affecting Release

Gate Status Release impact Owning document
DEC-012 legal/trademark/OSS sign-off Blocked / open Blocks public or store release docs/legal/trademark-and-attribution-review.md, docs/release/dv-waiver-register.md
Android Keystore-backed DEK Deferred to v1.1 Blocks claim that Android secrets use hardware-backed DEK protection docs/release/dv-waiver-register.md
Full state reducer test suite Partial Blocks full claim for SysRS-235/SysDes-103/SRS-059 through SRS-061 docs/release/dv-waiver-register.md
Desktop and iOS release artifacts Source-buildable / unsigned only Blocks broad binary distribution claims docs/release/release-readiness-go-nogo-record.md
Store signing and notarization Not complete for candidate Blocks production release docs/release/release-readiness-go-nogo-record.md

8. DV Recommendation

Recommended DV outcome: Pass documentation baseline with release waivers recorded.

This means the project has enough document structure to conduct DV review and continue internal candidate validation, but it does not mean the candidate is approved for public release. The release decision remains No-Go for public/store release until legal, signing, platform, and evidence gates are closed or formally waived by the accountable owners.