swung0x48/MobileGL
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/MobileGL-Dev/MobileGL synced 2026-09-18 00:58:30 +09:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[Docs] (Disaggregated): consolidate the five documents at the P5b close - drop superseded narrative, the -O0 device tables and process history, renumber MEASUREMENTS by phase, correct the catalogue and emit-table counts to the head, and record the Redmi pin profile

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
swung0x48
2026-09-16 23:08:39 -04:00
parent ea34bccb63
commit a79a0af69d
7 changed files with 713 additions and 1679 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/Disaggregated/devices/pin-verification-2026-09-07.md
+19 -408
View File
@@ -1,417 +1,28 @@
# P2 frequency-pin profiles: what was read, what was written, what was proven
# 设备定频档案与核验
Date: 2026-09-07. Devices: `35d0befa` (Xiaomi 24129PN74C, Snapdragon 8 Elite / SM8750, Adreno
830v2) and `3B159D009VZ00000` (Oppo PLG110 / ColorOS, MediaTek MT6993 "Dimensity 9500", Mali).
Both rooted via Magisk (`su` returns uid 0 in context `u:r:magisk:s0`). Host: Windows, Git Bash,
`MSYS_NO_PATHCONV=1` on every adb invocation.
本分支性能 A/B 所用设备的定频方式与核验结果。规则：每次运行前后各跑一次 `pin_device.sh <serial> check`，DRIFT 的运行作废重跑；stock 值硬编码、不从已钉设备采样（否则一次 restore 会把钉频变成永久）；温度门 40 °C；reboot-clean、同热窗口、两臂背靠背。
Outputs, all in this directory:
## 当前战役设备（2026-09-11 起，P4a 之后唯一用于 A/B 的设备）
| file | what it is |
|---|---|
| `xiaomi-adreno830.env` | completed profile, `PROFILE_VERIFIED=1` |
| `oppo-mali.env` | completed profile, `PROFILE_VERIFIED=1` |
| `pin_device.sh` | standalone `<serial> pin\|unpin\|check` helper, pure adb + su |
| `REPORT.md` | this file |
Both devices were left **unpinned**, confirmed by `pin_device.sh <serial> check` at the end
(transcripts at the bottom). Every node written was restored.
---
## Headline: bench.sh cannot pin either of these devices
This is the finding that matters most, because it inverts an assumption written into the
existing profiles.
The `pin_freqs()` / `unpin_freqs()` pair in bench.sh writes
`/proc/ppm/policy/hard_userlimit_{min,max}_cpu_freq` and `/proc/gpufreq/gpufreq_opp_freq`.
On these devices:
| path | `35d0befa` (Qualcomm) | `3B159D009VZ00000` (MediaTek) |
|---|---|---|
| `/proc/ppm/policy/` | absent | **absent** |
| `/proc/gpufreq/` | absent | **absent** (superseded by `/proc/gpufreqv2/`) |
The Qualcomm case was already anticipated - `xiaomi-adreno830.env` said so. The MediaTek case
was **not**: the old `oppo-mali.env` reasoned "this part is a MediaTek SoC, so unlike the Adreno
profile the harness's existing /proc/ppm + /proc/gpufreq pin path is probably the right one" and
set `PIN_STYLE=ppm`. It is not right. MT6993 is new enough to have dropped both legacy
interfaces. So the exact failure mode the `PROFILE_VERIFIED` guard was written to prevent - a
root `echo` redirect into a missing /proc path exiting 0, and the run then reporting itself as
pinned - was waiting on the device the guard's own comment guessed was safe.
Consequence for P2: run bench.sh / session.sh with **`--no-pin`**, drive the pin with
`pin_device.sh`, and use `pin_device.sh check` in place of the `big_cur`/`little_cur`/`gpu_cur_khz`
integrity fields. `PROFILE_VERIFIED=1` in the two profiles certifies *the nodes and pins in those
files*, not that bench.sh can drive them; both files say so in a header block. Teaching bench.sh
a `PIN_STYLE` switch is the real fix and is not done here.
---
## Device 1 - `35d0befa`, Xiaomi 24129PN74C / SM8750 / Adreno 830v2
### CPU: which policy is "big", which is "little"
`ro.board.platform=sun`, `ro.soc.model=SM8750`. Two policies, and **no true little cluster** -
SM8750 is a 2+6 part:
```
policy0 cpus 0 1 2 3 4 5 gov=walt cpuinfo 384000..3532800 (6x performance)
avail: 384000 556800 748800 960000 1152000 1363200 1555200 1785600 1996800 2227200
2400000 2745600 2918400 3072000 3321600 3532800
policy6 cpus 6 7 gov=walt cpuinfo 1017600..4320000 (2x prime)
avail: 1017600 1209600 1401600 1689600 1958400 2246400 2438400 2649600 2841600 3072000
3283200 3513600 3801600 4089600 4204800 4320000
```
So **big = policy6, little = policy0**, and both protocol targets are *exact* members of
`scaling_available_frequencies` - no rounding:
| role | policy | target | chosen | rounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| big | policy6 | 1.96 GHz | **1958400** | exact |
| little | policy0 | 1.55 GHz | **1555200** | exact |
### CPU: how to pin, and does it hold
Method: `scaling_min_freq = scaling_max_freq = target`, **stock `walt` governor left alone**. No
performance or userspace governor is needed - once min == max the governor has no room, and not
switching it means nothing extra to restore. (`migov walt conservative powersave performance
schedutil` are all offered.)
Writes returned exit 0 and took effect immediately. Held for the whole window under load
(8 concurrent `yes > /dev/null`), sampled every 5 s:
```
t=1 p0_cur=1555200 p0_min=1555200 p0_max=1555200 p6_cur=1958400 p6_min=1958400 p6_max=1958400 gpuclk=1100000000 cpuss-0-0=47100
t=2 p0_cur=1555200 (min/max same) p6_cur=1958400 (min/max same) gpuclk=1100000000 cpuss-0-0=49400
t=3 p0_cur=1555200 (min/max same) p6_cur=1958400 (min/max same) gpuclk=1100000000 cpuss-0-0=49800
t=4 p0_cur=1555200 (min/max same) p6_cur=1958400 (min/max same) gpuclk=1100000000 cpuss-0-0=50200
t=5 p0_cur=1555200 (min/max same) p6_cur=1958400 (min/max same) gpuclk=1100000000 cpuss-0-0=51300
t=6 p0_cur=1555200 (min/max same) p6_cur=1958400 (min/max same) gpuclk=1100000000 cpuss-0-0=52100
t=7 p0_cur=1555200 (min/max same) p6_cur=1958400 (min/max same) gpuclk=1100000000 cpuss-0-0=52100
```
7 samples over 30 s, **zero drift** on either cluster or the GPU, while the SoC heated 47 -> 52 C.
Restore sequence (verified back to the stock snapshot):
```
policy6: scaling_min_freq=1017600 scaling_max_freq=2841600
policy0: scaling_min_freq=556800 scaling_max_freq=2745600
```
`pin_device.sh` writes min -> `cpuinfo_min_freq` first, then max, then min, so the order works
regardless of where stock sits relative to the target (writing min above the current max is
clamped by cpufreq).
### GPU: kgsl pwrlevels
```
gpu_model=Adreno830v2 num_pwrlevels=14 default_pwrlevel=12
gpu_available_frequencies: 1100000000 1050000000 967000000 900000000 832000000 734000000
660000000 607000000 525000000 443000000 389000000 342000000
222000000 160000000
stock: min_pwrlevel=12 max_pwrlevel=0 gpuclk=222000000
devfreq/governor=msm-adreno-tz devfreq/min_freq=160000000 devfreq/max_freq=1050000000
```
Pin: `echo 0 > /sys/class/kgsl/kgsl-3d0/min_pwrlevel` and the same to `max_pwrlevel`, collapsing
the range onto level 0. `gpuclk` read `1100000000` immediately and for the whole 30 s window.
Worth noting: **the devfreq route cannot reach the top step.** `devfreq/max_freq` is 1050000000,
one OPP below level 0, so a `devfreq/min_freq` + `max_freq` pin tops out at 1050 MHz. The
pwrlevel pin unlocks 1100 MHz. Restore: `min_pwrlevel=12`, `max_pwrlevel=0`.
**Unit trap.** bench.sh reports `gpu_cur_khz` from `$GPU_CURFREQ_NODE` via `awk` taking the last
field. The kgsl `gpuclk` node is in **Hz**; the MediaTek `current_freqency` node is in **kHz**.
So on this device the field bench.sh calls `gpu_cur_khz` is actually Hz. The profile carries
`GPU_PIN_HZ=1100000000` and `GPU_CURFREQ_UNIT=hz` alongside a schema-compatible
`GPU_PIN_KHZ=1100000`; compare against the former.
**GPU util node corrected.** The draft profile had `GPU_UTIL_NODE=/sys/class/kgsl/kgsl-3d0/gpubusy`.
Reading `gpubusy` prints `263821 1008410` - busy and total *cycles* - and bench.sh takes the
first field, so it would have logged raw cycle counts as a busy percentage. Changed to
`gpu_busy_percentage`, which prints `26 %` and whose first field is what bench.sh means.
### Thermal
84 zones; type strings are unique, so the match-first-zone-by-type loop in bench.sh is
unambiguous. Chosen: **`cpuss-0-0`** (`thermal_zone13`), the CPU-subsystem sensor for the 6-core
cluster that carries most of the load, and the hottest of the candidates under the load test:
| zone | idle | end of 30 s load |
|---|---|---|
| `cpuss-0-0` (13) | 34700 | 52100 |
| `cpuss-1-0` (20) | - | 49000 |
| `quiet_therm` (71) | 29835 | 32668 (skin sensor, not SoC) |
| `gpuss-0` (23) | 31200 | - |
The 40 C gate is reachable: it idles at 34.7 C, and was observed between 36.6 and 40.1 C across
the session.
---
## Device 2 - `3B159D009VZ00000`, Oppo PLG110 / MT6993 / Mali
### CPU: three policies, and the one that would have silently ruined the pin
`ro.soc.model=MT6993`. MT6993 is a **4+3+1** part:
```
policy0 cpus 0 1 2 3 gov=sugov_ext cpuinfo 300000..2700000 stock max 2100000
policy4 cpus 4 5 6 gov=sugov_ext cpuinfo 300000..3500000 stock max 3500000
policy7 cpu 7 gov=sugov_ext cpuinfo 300000..4210000 stock max 3200000
```
Decision: **big = policy4, little = policy0**, *and policy7 is pinned to the big target as well*.
policy4 rather than policy7 is the structural analogue of the 2-core policy6 on the Xiaomi - a
multi-core cluster the render and worker threads can share, rather than a single core they would
contend for. But policy7 cannot be left alone: an unpinned 4.21 GHz core defeats the entire pin
the moment the scheduler lands a hot thread on it, and nothing in the result JSON would show it.
Pinned, the device reads as 4 little + 4 big.
Neither target is an exact OPP here - both are the **nearest available step**:
| role | policy | target | candidates | chosen | offset |
| 设备 | SoC / GPU | 大核 | 小核 | GPU | 备注 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| big | policy4 | 1958400 | 1900000 (-58400), 2000000 (+41600) | **2000000** | +2.1% |
| little | policy0 | 1555200 | 1500000 (-55200), 1600000 (+44800) | **1600000** | +2.9% |
| extra | policy7 | 1958400 | 2000000 is an exact member | **2000000** | +2.1% |
| Redmi M332BF `2f7cbe2e` | SM8750 / Adreno 830v2 | policy6 → 1958400（stock 1017600–3072000） | policy0 → 1555200（stock 556800–2745600） | kgsl `min/max_pwrlevel = 0`；2026-09-11 实测 1050 MHz（厂商 `thermal_pwrlevel` 锁 1），2026-09-16 起实测 1100 MHz | 主动风扇 `/sys/class/xm_power/hw_monitor/pwm_fan` 恒 level 2，用例间降温 <1 min；温度门 `cpuss-0-0` |
Carry that 2-3% offset when comparing absolute per-thread CPU cost against the Xiaomi.
与小米 `35d0befa` 同 SoC、同 OPP 表，两台的钉频数值可比；跨钉频口径（1050 vs 1100 MHz）的活动不可比钟频，只有同场配对可比。Redmi 的行目前只在 `~/w7/notes/p2/devices/pin_device.sh`（树外，`~/w7/notes/tools/p5b_codex_redmi.sh` 引用它）；树内 `tools/device_bench/pin_device.sh` 只含下面两台，把 Redmi 行并回树内是待办。
### CPU: how to pin, and does it hold
## 2026-09-07 核验：小米 `35d0befa` 与 Oppo `3B159D009VZ00000`（P2 / P3a 使用）
Same method (min = max = target, stock `sugov_ext` left alone). All six writes returned 0.
Held under the same 8-way load, sampled every 5 s, in `cur/min-max` form:
结论：`bench.sh` 的 `/proc/ppm` + `/proc/gpufreq` 钉法在两台上都不存在（MT6993 已改 `/proc/gpufreqv2/`），所以用 `bench.sh --no-pin` + `tools/device_bench/pin_device.sh <serial> pin|unpin|check`（纯 adb + su；exit 0 PINNED / 1 DRIFT / 2 UNPINNED，UNPINNED 非零使 `check && measure` 不可能量到未钉设备）。`devices/*.env` 的 `PROFILE_VERIFIED=1` 只认证文件里的节点与钉值，不认证 `bench.sh` 能驱动它们；给 `bench.sh` 加 `PIN_STYLE` 仍未做。
```
t=1 p0=1600000/1600000-1600000 p4=2000000/2000000-2000000 p7=2000000/2000000-2000000 gpu="0 1716000" soc_max=52833
t=2 p0=1600000/1600000-1600000 p4=2000000/2000000-2000000 p7=2000000/2000000-2000000 gpu="0 1716000" soc_max=56859
t=3 p0=1600000/1600000-1600000 p4=2000000/2000000-2000000 p7=2000000/2000000-2000000 gpu="0 1716000" soc_max=58063
t=4 p0=1600000/1600000-1600000 p4=2000000/2000000-2000000 p7=2000000/2000000-2000000 gpu="0 1716000" soc_max=59661
t=5 p0=1600000/1600000-1600000 p4=2000000/2000000-2000000 p7=2000000/2000000-2000000 gpu="0 1716000" soc_max=60353
t=6 p0=1600000/1600000-1600000 p4=2000000/2000000-2000000 p7=2000000/2000000-2000000 gpu="0 1716000" soc_max=61354
t=7 p0=1600000/1600000-1600000 p4=2000000/2000000-2000000 p7=2000000/2000000-2000000 gpu="0 1716000" soc_max=62025
```
| | 小米 24129PN74C（SM8750 / Adreno 830v2） | Oppo PLG110（MT6993 / Mali，gpufreqv2） |
|---|---|---|
| 大核 | policy6 → 1958400（精确 OPP；stock 1017600–2841600） | policy4 → 2000000（最近 OPP，+2.1%；stock 300000–3500000，厂商守护随后改回 3200000） |
| 小核 | policy0 → 1555200（精确；stock 556800–2745600） | policy0 → 1600000（+2.9%；stock 300000–2100000） |
| 额外 | — | policy7（单核 4.21 GHz）同钉 2000000，否则一个热线程就打破钉频 |
| 方法 | `scaling_min_freq = scaling_max_freq = 目标`；governor（walt / sugov_ext）不动；写序 min→`cpuinfo_min_freq`、max→目标、min→目标（min 高于当前 max 会被 cpufreq 钳住） | 同左 |
| GPU | `kgsl-3d0/{min,max}_pwrlevel = 0` → 1100 MHz（devfreq 路径封顶 1050）；`gpuclk` 单位是 Hz | `/proc/gpufreqv2/fix_target_opp_index = 0` → 1716000 kHz，恢复写 −1；不用 ged `custom_*`（取 OPP 下标、且被 urcc-service 争写） |
| 温度门 | `cpuss-0-0`（zone13），idle 34.7 °C | `soc_max`（zone14），idle 36–37 °C，门只勉强可达 |
| 30 s 八路负载核验 | 7 个样本零漂移，47 → 52 °C | 7 个样本零漂移，53 → 62 °C |
| 陷阱 | `gpubusy` 打的是周期数，busy 百分比读 `gpu_busy_percentage` | `scaling_governor/min/max` 是 0660 system，必须经 su 读，否则空值看起来像在工作 |
7 samples over 30 s, **zero drift** on all three policies, SoC 52.8 -> 62.0 C. The ColorOS
performance daemons did not contend for the cpufreq nodes during the window.
**Read permissions.** `scaling_governor`, `scaling_min_freq` and `scaling_max_freq` are `0660
system:system` here. A plain `adb shell cat .../scaling_governor` answers `Permission denied`,
which a careless parser reads as an empty governor rather than a failure. Every read goes through
su. Note `scaling_cur_freq` and `scaling_available_frequencies` *are* world-readable, which makes
the trap worse - a script can look like it is working.
### GPU: gpufreqv2, not legacy gpufreq
57 working OPPs, index 0 fastest:
```
/proc/gpufreqv2/gpu_working_opp_table
[00] freq: 1716000 [01] 1690000 [02] 1664000 ... [56] 390000 (kHz)
```
Pin: `echo 0 > /proc/gpufreqv2/fix_target_opp_index`; restore: `echo -1`. Evidence:
```
before : [GPUFREQ-DEBUG] fix GPU/STACK OPP index is disabled
after 0 : [GPUFREQ-DEBUG] fix GPU/STACK OPP index: 0/0
/sys/kernel/ged/hal/current_freqency = "0 1716000" (index 0, 1716000 kHz)
after -1: [GPUFREQ-DEBUG] fix GPU/STACK OPP index is disabled
```
**Deliberately not the ged `custom_boost_gpu_freq` / `custom_upbound_gpu_freq` pair**, the usual
MTK route, for two reasons both visible in the nodes:
1. On this kernel they take an **OPP index, not kHz**. Stock reads `boost=56`, `upbound=0` - a
floor at the slowest OPP and a ceiling at the fastest. Porting the kHz-valued
`GPU_PIN_KHZ=902000` from odinlite.env into them would write garbage.
2. Reading them prints a request log showing
`/odm/bin/hw/vendor.oplus.hardware.urcc-service` (pid 1534) writing the same nodes. A pin
there is one voter among several. `fix_target_opp_index` has no such contention.
### Thermal
87 zones, unique types. Chosen: **`soc_max`** (`thermal_zone14`) - the SoC-wide max aggregate,
which is what "SoC temperature" means for a gate, and the strictest candidate.
Cooldown series after the load test (screen awake, idle), 15 s apart:
```
soc_max 39094 37177 36806 35745 36954 36312
soc-top0 36361 35082 34641 34226 34079 34031
ap_ntc 36414 35034 34342 33965 33746 33566
```
It settles to **36-37 C**, so `THERMAL_START_MAX_MC=40000` is reachable - but only just, and it
was still reading 42.4 C several minutes after ordinary use. Expect this gate to actually wait,
unlike the one on the Xiaomi. Under load it went 52.8 -> 62.0 C in 30 s.
---
## Every node read or written
Read-only (both devices): `/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy*/{affected_cpus,
scaling_governor,scaling_available_governors,scaling_available_frequencies,cpuinfo_min_freq,
cpuinfo_max_freq,scaling_cur_freq}`, `/sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone*/{type,temp}`,
`getprop`, `id`.
Read-only, Xiaomi: `/sys/class/kgsl/kgsl-3d0/{gpu_model,num_pwrlevels,default_pwrlevel,
thermal_pwrlevel,max_gpuclk,gpuclk,clock_mhz,max_clock_mhz,min_clock_mhz,
gpu_available_frequencies,freq_table_mhz,gpubusy,gpu_busy_percentage,throttling,temp}`,
`/sys/class/kgsl/kgsl-3d0/devfreq/{name,governor,available_governors,available_frequencies,
cur_freq,min_freq,max_freq,target_freq,gpu_load,mod_percent}`, `/sys/class/devfreq/`.
Read-only, Oppo: `/proc/gpufreqv2/{gpufreq_status,gpu_working_opp_table,fix_target_opp_index}`,
`/sys/kernel/ged/hal/{current_freqency,custom_boost_gpu_freq,custom_upbound_gpu_freq,
gpu_utilization,total_gpu_freq_level_count}`.
**Written** (all restored):
| device | node | stock | pinned to | restored to |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xiaomi | `policy6/scaling_min_freq` | 1017600 | 1958400 | 1017600 |
| Xiaomi | `policy6/scaling_max_freq` | 2841600 | 1958400 | 2841600 |
| Xiaomi | `policy0/scaling_min_freq` | 556800 | 1555200 | 556800 |
| Xiaomi | `policy0/scaling_max_freq` | 2745600 | 1555200 | 2745600 |
| Xiaomi | `kgsl-3d0/min_pwrlevel` | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Xiaomi | `kgsl-3d0/max_pwrlevel` | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oppo | `policy0/scaling_min_freq` | 300000 | 1600000 | 300000 |
| Oppo | `policy0/scaling_max_freq` | 2100000 | 1600000 | 2100000 |
| Oppo | `policy4/scaling_min_freq` | 300000 | 2000000 | 300000 |
| Oppo | `policy4/scaling_max_freq` | 3500000 | 2000000 | 3500000, then 3200000 by the vendor daemon - see below |
| Oppo | `policy7/scaling_min_freq` | 300000 | 2000000 | 300000 |
| Oppo | `policy7/scaling_max_freq` | 3200000 | 2000000 | 3200000 |
| Oppo | `/proc/gpufreqv2/fix_target_opp_index` | disabled | 0 | -1 (disabled) |
No governor was ever written on either device; both stayed on their vendor governor (`walt`,
`sugov_ext`) throughout. Nothing else was written - no `settings put`, no thermal-engine
tampering, no app installs.
### The one restore that does not settle at its stock value
On the Oppo, `policy4/scaling_max_freq` was restored to its snapshotted 3500000 and a ColorOS
daemon lowered it to **3200000** by itself within seconds. This is correct behaviour - the range
is handed back and the vendor takes over - but it means **stock maxima on this device are not
constants**.
It caught a real bug in the first version of `pin_device.sh check`, which classified each node as
at-pin / at-stock / neither and reported DRIFT for anything else: it declared DRIFT on a device
that had been released perfectly. The classifier now asserts only against *our* pins (pinned
means `min == max == pin`; anything else is not pinned, with a `min == max` at some other value
flagged as an external clamp, which is equally fatal to comparability). The hardcoded stock
values still drive the restore path, where handing the range back is all they have to do.
---
## `pin_device.sh`
Usage: `pin_device.sh <serial> pin|unpin|check`. Pure adb + su; no profile sourcing, no bench.sh.
The device table (policies, pins, stock values, GPU style, thermal zone type) is embedded so it
has no inputs to get wrong. All three actions print the live big/little/GPU frequencies,
governors and gate temperature, so the output of `pin` and of `unpin` is itself the before/after
evidence.
Exit codes: **0** PINNED (every pinned node at its pin and every live frequency equal to it),
**1** DRIFT (partly pinned, externally clamped, or a live frequency has left its pin - discard any
overlapping run), **2** UNPINNED (no node is at a pin this script set). UNPINNED is non-zero on
purpose, so that `pin_device.sh X check && measure` cannot silently measure an unpinned device.
Three things it does that are load-bearing:
- **Write order** is min -> `cpuinfo_min_freq`, then max -> target, then min -> target. Setting
min above the current max is clamped by cpufreq, so a naive two-write pin half-applies
depending on where stock sits relative to the target.
- **Stock values are hardcoded, not sampled at pin time.** A restore that read "stock" off an
already-pinned device would make the pin permanent.
- **The device-side read emits raw node contents and parses locally.** The read is delivered as a
single-quoted `su -c` argument, so a single quote inside it (an awk program, a sed expression)
closes that quoting and the whole read returns nothing. That bug was hit during this work: the
Oppo `check` printed `<unread>` for every field and reported DRIFT on a correctly pinned
device. A zero-key read is now a hard error (exit 66), not a verdict.
### Final `check` on both devices, unpinned state
```
$ pin_device.sh 35d0befa check
== check ==
device : Xiaomi 24129PN74C / SM8750 / Adreno 830v2 (35d0befa)
big policy6 gov=walt cur=2841600 min=1017600 max=2841600 (pin 1958400 / stock 1017600-2841600)
little policy0 gov=walt cur=2400000 min=556800 max=2745600 (pin 1555200 / stock 556800-2745600)
gpu kgsl-3d0 pwrlevel=0..12 freq=222000000 Hz busy=7% (pin lvl 0 = 1100000000 Hz / stock lvl 0..12)
thermal cpuss-0-0 38200 mC = 38.2 C (/sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone13)
VERDICT: UNPINNED - none of the 3 nodes is at a pin this script set; the vendor
governors have their range back and nothing this script writes is in effect.
rc=2
```
```
$ pin_device.sh 3B159D009VZ00000 check
== check ==
device : Oppo PLG110 / MT6993 / Mali (gpufreqv2) (3B159D009VZ00000)
big policy4 gov=sugov_ext cur=300000 min=300000 max=3200000 (pin 2000000 / stock 300000-3500000)
little policy0 gov=sugov_ext cur=2100000 min=300000 max=2100000 (pin 1600000 / stock 300000-2100000)
extra policy7 gov=sugov_ext cur=2750000 min=300000 max=3200000 (pin 2000000 / stock 300000-3200000)
gpu gpufreqv2 fix_opp=off freq=1508000 kHz busy=0% (pin idx 0 = 1716000 kHz / stock off)
thermal soc_max 45292 mC = 45.3 C (/sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone14)
VERDICT: UNPINNED - none of the 4 nodes is at a pin this script set; the vendor
governors have their range back and nothing this script writes is in effect.
note: big(policy4) unpinned, range 300000-3200000 (recorded stock 300000-3500000, which vendor daemons move)
rc=2
```
Both report their stock governors (`walt`, `sugov_ext`), the GPU back on DVFS
(pwrlevel 0..12 / `fix_opp=off`), and cpufreq ranges wide open. Nothing written is still in
effect.
For the record, the pinned half of the same cycle on each device:
```
$ pin_device.sh 35d0befa pin (after pin)
big policy6 gov=walt cur=1958400 min=1958400 max=1958400
little policy0 gov=walt cur=1555200 min=1555200 max=1555200
gpu kgsl-3d0 pwrlevel=0..0 freq=1100000000 Hz
VERDICT: PINNED - all 3 pinned nodes at their pins, live frequencies match. rc=0
$ pin_device.sh 3B159D009VZ00000 pin (after pin)
big policy4 gov=sugov_ext cur=2000000 min=2000000 max=2000000
little policy0 gov=sugov_ext cur=1600000 min=1600000 max=1600000
extra policy7 gov=sugov_ext cur=2000000 min=2000000 max=2000000
gpu gpufreqv2 fix_opp=0 freq=1716000 kHz
VERDICT: PINNED - all 4 pinned nodes at their pins, live frequencies match. rc=0
```
---
## What is NOT verified
1. **bench.sh cannot drive these pins.** Not fixed here. The profiles are verified; the harness
integration is not. Use `--no-pin` plus `pin_device.sh` until a `PIN_STYLE` switch exists.
2. **The Oppo GPU pin was confirmed at the DVFS-request level, not under graphics load.** The
pinned window was a CPU load, so the GPU was power-collapsed throughout (`gpufreq_status`
showed `PowerCount: 0`). `current_freqency` reported OPP index 0 / 1716000 kHz for the whole
window - which is exactly the field bench.sh samples as `gpu_cur_khz`, so the check bench.sh
would perform does pass - but nobody has watched this GPU actually clock 1716 MHz while
rendering. Related readout quirk: while powered down, `/proc/gpufreqv2/gpufreq_status` keeps
printing `Freq: 26000` for the fixed OPP entry. That is a parked rail, not the pin failing;
`current_freqency` is the node to believe.
3. **Pin durability over a full bench window is untested.** The verification window is 30 s of
synthetic CPU load, which is what the README defines. Neither device was held pinned through a
180 s warmup plus a 30-sample measurement with the game running, where a vendor game-boost
daemon has far more reason to intervene than it did here. Running `pin_device.sh check` after
each run is what closes that gap; treat `rc=1` as "discard the run".
4. **Thermal gate behaviour under the real protocol is untested.** 40 C is reachable on both, but
on the Oppo it idles only 3-4 C below the gate, so back-to-back paired runs will spend real
time waiting. Nobody has measured how long.
5. **No reboot test.** All pins were applied and released within one session. Nothing here
persists across a reboot by construction (every node written is volatile sysfs or procfs), but
that was not demonstrated.
6. **The `walt` governor and the Xiaomi thermal daemon were never provoked.** 30 s at 52 C is
well short of the thermal-limit regime where `thermal_pwrlevel` (read 0 throughout) would
start capping the GPU.
两台核验后均已解钉并复核 UNPINNED，写过的节点全部恢复。未核验：Oppo GPU 钉在图形负载下的实际时钟（核验窗口 GPU 处于 power-collapse）、整场 bench 窗口内的钉频持久性、重启后状态、厂商热管理介入。