[Fix, Test] (Magma, MG_Test): cover the {slot, gen} generation in a unit test that forces a real slot reuse, and stop claiming the ABA lanes do

- 55d2af9b claimed - in its message, in MagmaPipeArms.h, in VertexInputStateFactory.cpp and
  in MG_IntegrationTest/CMakeLists.txt - that the AbaControlHandles lane defeats the
  GENERATION in {slot, gen}. It does not, and no lane of that shape can. Magma's mint has no
  death notification (nothing in MG_Backend/DirectVulkan consumes NotifyStateObjectDestroyed)
  and returns a slot only through OnFrameBoundary's age sweep, kSweepInterval 256 /
  kRetireAgeBoundaries 1024; HandleRecycleScenario issues five frame boundaries, so the
  replacement VAO acquires against an empty free list and gets a BRAND-NEW slot at Gen 1
  (measured: redVao slot=2 gen=1, greenVao slot=3 gen=1). The knob-off FRESH verdict there is
  decided by the SLOT alone, and deleting ++m_entries[index].Gen leaves all 32 HandleRecycle
  entries green - re-measured this round.
- What the lane does defeat is the object identity that SELECTS the slot, which IS the key the
  handle arm ships, and that is what the three code sites now say. The two requirements are
  mutually exclusive for the pixel-visible memo: a genuine slot reuse needs >= 1024 idle
  boundaries after the dead object's last draw, which necessarily puts the two draws in
  different frames, and ResolvedVertexBindings - the only memo carrying a GPU slice rather
  than a layout - declines across frames by design.
- So the generation is covered where it IS expressible. MG_Test/Pipe/MagmaPipeIdentityTest.cpp
  drives the mint's real retire -> reuse (1280 boundaries, with a keep-alive object holding the
  first allocatable slot so the reuse is not the slot the control aliases onto) and asserts
  four things: the retired slot comes back with Gen+1; with the knob OFF a memo stamped at
  {slot, gen=N} is NOT served at {slot, gen=N+1}; with the knob ON it IS, out of one uncleared
  and unclaimed entry; and a live object keeps its slot, its generation and its memo across two
  sweeps, so the generation cannot be "fixed" by bumping it on every acquisition.
- The claim rule itself moves into MagmaPipeArms.h as MagmaPipeClaimSlotMemos so the suite
  exercises production code rather than a copy of it. VertexInputStateFactory::MemosFor is now
  one call to it and is otherwise unchanged, on both the knob-on and the knob-off path.
- Load-bearing, measured: with ++m_entries[index].Gen commented out, ctest -L unit in
  build-push goes 1563/1566 - three of the four new cases red, one of them naming the inherited
  0xDEAD payload out of the same slot - while ctest -R HandleRecycle stays 32/32. Restored, all
  four pass in build-push and build-verify and skip visibly in the pull build, so the ctest name
  sets stay identical (G2).
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-08 01:08:51 -04:00
parent c73ae7d443
commit a9778eaabe
5 changed files with 326 additions and 26 deletions
@@ -157,11 +157,33 @@ namespace MobileGL::MG_Backend::DirectVulkan {
// So the control no longer asks the allocator for the collision; it manufactures it. On
// both arms the object identity is replaced by a constant, which is the strongest form of
// "the allocator handed the block back" and is deterministic. That covers strictly more
// than D18's spelling, and in particular it covers the arm P2 SHIPS: on the handle arm
// the constant defeats the GENERATION in {slot, gen}, which is the whole of what makes
// the re-keyed memos ABA-safe. Defeating only the retired lifetime-id/address guards
// would leave the shipped key untested, which is exactly the vacuity this control exists
// to catch.
// than D18's spelling, and in particular it reaches the arm P2 SHIPS: on the handle arm
// the constant defeats the OBJECT IDENTITY THAT SELECTS THE SLOT - the key the handle arm
// ships - so the replacement VAO is handed the dead one's memo entry and its content hash.
// Defeating only the retired lifetime-id/address guards would leave that key untested,
// which is exactly the vacuity this control exists to catch.
//
// WHAT IT DOES NOT COVER, AND WHY NO REPRODUCER OF THIS SHAPE CAN [fix-aba review v1,
// MAJOR 1]. It does NOT exercise the GENERATION half of {slot, gen}:
//
// * this mint has no death notification - nothing in MG_Backend/DirectVulkan consumes
// NotifyStateObjectDestroyed - so a slot returns to the free list only through
// OnFrameBoundary's age sweep (kSweepInterval 256, kRetireAgeBoundaries 1024, below);
// * HandleRecycleScenario issues five frame boundaries, so the free list is empty when
// the replacement VAO acquires and it gets a BRAND-NEW slot at Gen 1 (measured:
// redVao slot=2 gen=1, greenVao slot=3 gen=1). The knob-off FRESH verdict there is
// decided by the SLOT alone, and deleting the ++Gen below leaves all four arms green;
// * a genuine slot REUSE needs >= 1024 idle boundaries after the dead object's last
// draw, which necessarily puts the two draws in different frames - and the only memo
// that carries a GPU slice rather than a layout, ResolvedVertexBindings, declines
// across frames by design. The two requirements are mutually exclusive, so the
// generation is out of reach of any same-frame pixel reproducer for this memo.
//
// The generation is covered where it IS expressible, over this mint and the claim rule
// MagmaPipeClaimSlotMemos below: MG_Test/Pipe/MagmaPipeIdentityTest.cpp drives a real
// retire -> reuse and asserts that a memo stamped at {slot, gen=N} is not served at
// {slot, gen=N+1} with the knob off and IS served with it on. Deleting the ++Gen reds that
// suite; it is the only place in the tree where that deletion is caught.
//
// Everything the control does NOT defeat is as load-bearing as what it does. It never
// touches a guard that is not an IDENTITY guard: the resolved-bindings memo's frame
@@ -442,5 +464,35 @@ namespace MobileGL::MG_Backend::DirectVulkan {
};
Vector<UniquePtr<Chunk>> m_chunks;
};
// The claim rule every per-slot memo table uses, in one place so that the rule and the
// negative control that defeats it cannot drift apart between consumers - and so that the
// unit suite which drives a REAL slot reuse (MG_Test/Pipe/MagmaPipeIdentityTest.cpp) tests
// this code rather than a copy of it.
//
// The SLOT picks the entry; the WHOLE handle - Gen included - decides whether the entry is
// this object's. A slot the mint recycled for a different object comes back with a moved
// Gen, so the compare fails and the entry is cleared rather than inherited. That is the
// half HandleRecycleScenario cannot reach (see MagmaPipeAbaControlDefeatsIdentity).
//
// With negative control C on, every object collapses onto one entry and the entry is handed
// back UNCLEARED and UNCLAIMED - at once "the replacement reproduced its predecessor's
// slot" and "the slot was reused and Gen did not move".
//
// `Memos` needs a MG_Pipe::MGPipeHandle member named Owner and a default constructor that
// means "empty"; VertexInputStateFactory::VaoBackendMemos is the one production instance.
template <typename Memos, Uint32 kChunkEntries>
inline Memos& MagmaPipeClaimSlotMemos(MagmaPipeSlotTable<Memos, kChunkEntries>& table,
const MG_Pipe::MGPipeHandle& handle) {
if (MagmaPipeAbaControlDefeatsIdentity()) {
return table[kMagmaPipeAbaControlSlotIndex];
}
Memos& memos = table[MagmaPipeSlotIndex(handle)];
if (!(memos.Owner == handle)) {
memos = Memos{};
memos.Owner = handle;
}
return memos;
}
#endif // MOBILEGL_PIPE_PUSH
} // namespace MobileGL::MG_Backend::DirectVulkan
@@ -98,22 +98,16 @@ namespace MobileGL::MG_Backend::DirectVulkan {
// does this, and no two live VAOs can share an entry however large the working set is.
// There is no probe in front of it because the mint itself is one - a one-entry memo
// hit for every acquisition after this draw's first, and a hash probe otherwise.
if (MagmaPipeAbaControlDefeatsIdentity()) {
// Negative control C: one entry for every VAO, claimed without the Owner compare,
// which is precisely "the slot was recycled and Gen did not move". The replacement
// therefore inherits the dead VAO's content hash and its resolved-entry pointer -
// the two facts the generation is the only thing protecting.
return m_vaoMemos[kMagmaPipeAbaControlSlotIndex];
}
VaoBackendMemos& memos = m_vaoMemos[MagmaPipeSlotIndex(handle)];
if (!(memos.Owner == handle)) {
// A slot whose Gen moved because the identity table recycled it for a different
// object. Claim it, contents cleared - never inherited, which is the whole point
// of keying on the generation.
memos = VaoBackendMemos{};
memos.Owner = handle;
}
return memos;
//
// The claim rule - the slot picks the entry, the whole handle (Gen included) decides
// whose it is - and negative control C's defeat of it are MagmaPipeArms.h's
// MagmaPipeClaimSlotMemos, so that the unit suite which drives a REAL slot reuse
// (MG_Test/Pipe/MagmaPipeIdentityTest.cpp) exercises this code and not a copy of it.
// What the control defeats HERE is the identity that SELECTS the entry: every VAO
// collapses onto one, handed back uncleared, so the replacement inherits the dead
// VAO's content hash and its resolved-entry pointer. The GENERATION half is the unit
// suite's business, for the reason MagmaPipeAbaControlDefeatsIdentity spells out.
return MagmaPipeClaimSlotMemos(m_vaoMemos, handle);
}
#endif