mirror of
https://github.com/MobileGL-Dev/MobileGL
synced 2026-11-07 01:53:24 +09:00
Two things land together: the plan and contract draft P6 needs before it starts, and the
working notes that until now existed on exactly one machine.
1. P6's plan and contract draft (neither started; not one line of code)
docs/Disaggregated/P6-SPAWN-PLAN.md the package plan
docs/Disaggregated/P6-CONTRACT-DRAFT.md the contract draft (moves to
MG_Remote/CONTRACT-P6.md when c6 lands)
The three findings that mattered, all written into the documents:
a. P6 is SMALLER than its roadmap cell suggests. The transport primitives are already in
the tree and already tested: SocketDoorbell including hangup detection and the two
lost-wakeup fences (Doorbell.cpp:211-360, four cases in FdPassingTest), SCM_RIGHTS fd
passing, ShmSegment::Adopt, and the SurfaceOp / WindowKind schema already defined in
protocol.fbs. inproc uses a real second shm mapping rather than an alias, and
SessionRings.h:22-28 says that was done so today is not the first time it runs. P6 is
assembly plus a control plane plus a process, not "write a socket transport".
b. The evidence for "P6 is only a transport swap" has EXPIRED. It was bought by P5c, whose
audit found 59 direct memory accesses in a tree that already looked clean. P5e changed
the tree again. So the first package, a6, is a read-only audit that writes no code, and
every contract row that depends on it is marked PENDING a6 rather than decided in
advance.
c. P6 does not get a game running on the phone. ANativeWindow* is meaningless in the child,
and protocol.fbs:186-196's own comment says Android transfers the window out of band -
that band is P12. P6 lands pbuffer / surfaceless / offscreen, which is what HeadlessGL,
the split-equivalent lane and trace replay need, and which is exactly what P6's own exit
gate measures. A real window reaching the server is a named refusal. This gets its own
section because "P6 is done" would otherwise read as "the game runs now".
The contract adds rule G: a role may not name a process-local handle. It extends P5c's
rule E (a role may not name the other role's memory) from memory to identity - EGLDisplay /
EGLSurface / EGLContext / ANativeWindow* / fd number / pid / mapped address either cross as
a token this contract defines or they do not cross, and a descriptor crosses only through
SCM_RIGHTS, where the kernel renumbers it.
What P5e left for P6 gets its own section. The latch semantics are already designed
(ARCHITECTURE.md:504) and are copied unchanged. What is new is that after run-ahead the
client no longer waits while the peer process can DIE: the client holds records that were
published and will never be applied, and Android's freezer suspends the child without
closing anything. So slow and dead must be distinguishable WITHOUT a timeout threshold.
That is P6's only new design; everything else is carriage. It shares a predicate with E1's
outstanding re-specification (ID-122), and the two should be designed together.
Two gates carried over from P5e's lessons: G2 requires integration-spawn's test-name set to
match integration-split's name for name, because a differing set means the lane is quietly
running less; and the arm-proof gate requires every entry to record the child pid and
transport=spawn in its OWN private log - ID-124 established that this kind of false green
really happens, and a spawn lane that actually ran monolith would pass every other gate.
S2's shape must be settled before it is written, and the document says why: E1 is the
cautionary case.
2. The working notes move into the repository (docs/Disaggregated/notes/, 415 .md files)
ROADMAP / CURRENT_STAGE_PROGRESS / MEASUREMENTS cite ruling numbers, audit line numbers and
the provenance of gate figures from ~/w7/notes/, a directory that exists on one machine and
is under no version control. A record cited hundreds of times that lives only locally is not
a record, so it moves in whole, with its directory structure intact.
Only .md moves. Scripts, run logs, census and gate result JSON, patches, APKs and nm dumps
stay where they are: they are evidence DATA rather than documents - large, regenerated per
run, and mostly carrying absolute paths and device serials that mean something only on the
machine that produced them. The mapping and this split are written in
docs/Disaggregated/notes/README.md.
Two exceptions are recorded there too: P6's BRIEF has been promoted to a first-class
document and keeps no copy under notes/, so the two cannot drift apart; and recovered/ holds
material salvaged from failed workflow runs, which may duplicate the like-named phase
directories and is kept because a few of those were the only complete version at the time.
CI's citation lint takes docs/Disaggregated/*.md only (non-recursive), and notes/ is
deliberately outside it: those notes' file:line citations were written against their own
code heads, and resolving them against today's HEAD would fail wholesale - which is not an
error, it is their correct state as a historical record. To check one, use the revision it
declares (--rev).
3. Inconsistencies fixed in passing
- README.md's status line still said P5e was in progress while the stage table already said
closed.
- CURRENT_STAGE_PROGRESS's next-step item 1 still listed the exit gate as pending, though
(a) and (b) were run in the previous commit; rewritten to closed plus the one item that
actually remains (E1).
- ROADMAP's P6 row still had the pre-phase plan in three of its cells; it now carries the
package order, the scope boundary and the two new gates.
Checked with check_doc_citations.py: 125 citations across docs/Disaggregated/*.md, 0 problems.
6.5 KiB
6.5 KiB
Brief: rewrite docs/Disaggregated/ into a clear, concise design + architecture document set
The user's instruction (verbatim, this is the goal)
"make documentations in docs/Disaggregated clear and concise. Make it just clearly describe the design and architecture, rather than decision dilemmas."
What exists today (branch feat/disaggregated, WSL tree ~/w7/pipe, HEAD 458ccde1)
docs/Disaggregated/PLAN.md(~312 KB, Chinese): the single implementation plan for MGPipe — the gallium-style explicit frontend/backend interface + backend-owned state machine + two-process split. It grew out of a design competition and three adversarial review rounds, so it is full of "v1 said X, v2 corrected to Y", "(P0 实测修正)…" patches, rejected alternatives, risk tables arguing with reviewers, and "待证/已证" bookkeeping. The design itself is settled; the prose is not.docs/Disaggregated/REVIEW.md: the design-competition and adversarial-review record.scripts/check_doc_citations.py: CI lint (jobpipe-gatesin.github/workflows/test.yml) that requires everyfile:linecitation indocs/Disaggregated/*.mdto resolve on the baseline commit. Run it and keep it green (read the script for its exact contract, base commit and invocation;python3 scripts/check_doc_citations.py --helpor read the CI job).- Code that already exists and that the docs must describe accurately (read it, do not guess):
MobileGL/MG_Pipe/(PipeCalls.def — 71 calls after P-2 — MGPipeTypes.h, MGPipeHandles.h, MGPipeCallbacks.h, MGPipeHostSpan.h, MGPipe.h, Coverage.def, generated/),scripts/gen_pipe.py,scripts/gen_pipe_dirty_surface.py,scripts/gen_protocol.py,MobileGL/MG_Remote/{Protocol,Transport}(protocol.fbs, Ring/RingControl, Doorbell, ShmSegment, FdPassing, InProcessTransport, Framing),MobileGL/MG_Util/Metrics/PipeStats.{h,cpp}, ConfigLoader'sMOBILEGL_PIPE_*knobs,tools/spikes/{server_stub,extmem_probe},MobileGL/MG_Test/Pipe,MobileGL/MG_Test/Wire,MobileGL/MG_Test/Util/PipeStatsTest.cpp. - Measured facts from P0 (these replace every "待证 / 设备锁 / 欠着" sentence in the current PLAN.md): read
<this directory>/p0-device-findings.md— spike A (exec a second native binary from the app's ownuntrusted_appprocess) is proven on both devices; spike B's external-memory tiers per device; the on-device MGPipe stats baselines (accessor calls per draw, bytes per frame per class, upload shapes, memo gates) for four traces on both backends; the harness facts (JSON dump never fires on device,MOBILEGL_PIPE_STATS_PERIOD, serial device runs); and that the create-indirect fixture's failure on Adreno 830 is pre-existing atdev@81b17c0b(verified with a baseline APK), i.e. not caused by this branch.
What to produce
Rewrite docs/Disaggregated/ so a reader who has never seen the reviews can understand the design and the architecture and go implement the next phase. Chinese, same as today (technical identifiers in English). Suggested shape — adjust if the material argues for something else, but keep it small:
README.md— one page: what MGPipe is, the one-paragraph architecture (client tracker → MGPipe verbs → server object table → backend; monolith vs split build shapes), the status line (P0 landed at 458ccde1; P0.5/P1/P2 next; GO/NO-GO at day 43), and a map of the other files.ARCHITECTURE.md— the design as decided: handles and generations; the call catalogue by group (screen / ctx-query / CSO / state / object / verb) and the record layout conventions (payload structs, var-tails, host spans, chunking bound = half the ring); render state as blob + CSO identity subset +set_dynamic_state; push-at-validate; texture subdata accumulation andresource_subdata(union box + region list); shader state = SPIR-V + reflection (the P0.5 header extraction it depends on); the reverse channel (callbacks +resource_subdata_complete); persistent maps and the external-memory tiers as measured; restart rewrite / multi-draw tiering on the server with the index host mirror; the transport (SPSC shm ring, RingControl cursors, doorbells, FlatBuffers control plane, SCM_RIGHTS, present credit); process/EGL/Android delivery (lib*.so executable, fork+execve, marker files); build shapes and purity gates; the verification strategy (PipeInputs strangler,MOBILEGL_PIPE_VERIFY, generation poison, the CI gates that exist). State each decision as a decision with its one-line reason; do NOT reproduce the dilemma, the rejected options or the review argument. Where a number justifies a decision, cite the measured number (from the findings file or PLAN.md's measured sections), not the estimate it replaced.ROADMAP.md— phases P0…P13 as a compact table (what lands, acceptance gate, dependency), the day-43 GO/NO-GO criteria as a checklist, and the genuinely open questions as a short list (drop the ones P0 answered).MEASUREMENTS.md(or a section) — the P0 baselines and spike results as tables, with the exact device / commit / command so they can be reproduced.- Delete
REVIEW.mdfrom this directory (the review record lives in git history: mention the commit range in README). DeletePLAN.mdonce its content is fully carried over — nothing that is still true and still needed may be lost, so do the carry-over section by section and keep a checklist in your notes; what is lost on purpose is the dilemma prose, superseded estimates, "v1/v2" archaeology and reviewer back-and-forth. - Every
file:lineyou keep or add must be verified against the tree (open the file, check the line) and must passscripts/check_doc_citations.py. Prefer citing a symbol name plus file over a raw line number when the doc will outlive the line.
Constraints
- Docs only. Do not touch code, scripts, workflows or tests (the citation checker's config is the one exception if a deleted file name must be dropped from it — then say so).
- Work in a git worktree:
cd ~/w7/pipe && git worktree add ~/w7/p0-docs -b p0/docs-rewrite feat/disaggregated. Commit there in one or a few commits; do not push. Commit message: single-line subject[Docs] (Disaggregated): …+ blank line +-bullets; no Co-Authored-By. - Long outputs go to files, never into your return value: write your carry-over checklist to
~/w7/p0-docs-notes.mdand return only the branch name, commit hashes, the doc file list with sizes, the citation-check result, and anything you deliberately dropped that a reader might miss. - Keep it concise: the target is roughly a quarter of today's volume or less. Concise means no repetition and no argument, not omitted design.