mirror of
https://github.com/MobileGL-Dev/MobileGL
synced 2026-11-07 01:53:24 +09:00
swung0x48
07f4e3acef
- the summary line ("N divergence(s) survived MOBILEGL_PIPE_VERIFY_FATAL=0") came from a namespace-scope static's destructor, which runs from __run_exit_handlers AFTER MobileGL::Destroy has called MG_Util::Debug::Close(); Close nulls the role's sink, Log.cpp's WriteToFile re-runs InitFile() for the next line, and InitFile opens the role's file with "w" - so that one line was the only line the client half of every FATAL=0 run kept (121 B: the entry compare's reports, the arming line and the config dump all gone, on the split corrupt / read-corrupt entries and on the monolith arm's VerifyCorrupted. log alike)
- fixed in verify-only code, since Log.cpp is in the pull build and G1 admits no byte there: VerifyState gains FlushSummary(), which reports the count once (idempotent - a second call with nothing new, the destructor's own included, writes nothing); MGPipeVerifyFlushSummary() exports it from PipeFill.cpp, declared in PipeInputs.h beside the other verify-only entry points, and DestroyImpl calls it right before Close under #if MOBILEGL_PIPE_VERIFY
- the note's A' paragraph no longer says the entry compare is silent on the pack field - it reports it (the client summaries read 4 divergence(s) on DirectGLES / 3 on DirectVulkan); the red line can only come from the read arm because of where=read and the server-role file, and the paragraph now names the truncation and carries the numbers
- measured on the same entry, pipe-verify-split-read-corrupt-DirectGLES.client.log: 121 B / 1 line before, 7461 B / 85 lines after (DirectVulkan 121 B / 1 line -> 7386 B / 85 lines), with the where=entry report (1 each; the summary's 4 / 3 is that one plus the server's 3 / 2 read reports, the counter being process-wide) and the arming line present and the summary as the last line
工作笔记（原 ~/w7/notes/）
这一层是 MGPipe 各阶段的工作笔记原件：包计划（BRIEF-*.md）、契约草稿、集成者逐条裁定
（INTEGRATOR-DECISIONS-*.md）、只读审计、普查、设备记录、包任务书（TASK-*.md）与阶段报告。
它们此前只存在于一台机器的 ~/w7/notes/ 下。上层那几份文档（ROADMAP.md、
CURRENT_STAGE_PROGRESS.md、MEASUREMENTS.md …）大量引用它们——裁定编号、审计行号、
逐门数字的出处几乎全在这里。一份引用了几百次、却只存在于本地未跟踪目录的记录，等于没有记录。
所以整体移进仓库。
路径映射
~/w7/notes/<phase>/<file>.md → docs/Disaggregated/notes/<phase>/<file>.md
上层文档里凡写作 ~/w7/notes/... 的 .md 引用，都按这条规则读。
移进来的是什么，没移的是什么
| 移进来了 | 全部 .md，415 份，约 11 MB，目录结构原样保留 |
| 没有移 | 脚本（.sh / .py）、运行日志（.log / .out / .err）、普查与门的结果数据（.json / .txt / .tsv）、补丁、APK 与 .idsig、nm 转储 |
没移的那些仍在 ~/w7/notes/ 与各构建树下。它们是证据数据而不是文档：体积大、随每次运行
重新产生、且多数只在产生它的那台机器上有意义（绝对路径、设备序列号、构建目录）。上层文档引用
它们时给的是路径，不是内容。
两个需要知道的例外
- P6 的包计划已提升为正式文档：原
~/w7/notes/p6/BRIEF-P6.md现在是../P6-SPAWN-PLAN.md，本目录不再保留副本，避免两份同源文档各自漂移。 契约草稿同理，见../P6-CONTRACT-DRAFT.md。 recovered/是从失败的 workflow 运行里捞回来的材料（wf1…wf5），与同名阶段目录 可能重复，保留是因为其中几份是当时唯一的完整版本。查阶段记录请先看阶段目录。
不受 citation lint 管
CI 的文档引用 lint 只吃 docs/Disaggregated/*.md（非递归，.github/workflows/test.yml），
本目录不在其中，这是有意的：这些笔记的 file:line 是写在各自当时的代码头上的，拿今天的
HEAD 去解析必然大面积失败，而那不是错误——那是它们作为历史记录的正确状态。要核对某份笔记的
引用，用它自己声明的那个 revision：
python3 scripts/check_doc_citations.py --rev <当时的头> docs/Disaggregated/notes/<phase>/<file>.md