mirror of
https://github.com/MobileGL-Dev/MobileGL
synced 2026-11-07 01:53:24 +09:00
swung0x48
1255caa2fb
CONTRACT-P7 §5.4, OQ-10. InitServerRoleCommon computes the whole capability mask and
never ORed this bit, so MGPipeResourceOpsHaveSubDataResident answered false under every
transport and BOTH backends were pinned to the ordered in-place host memcpy - which made
Magma's SubDataResident arm (VkBufferManager.cpp's g_vulkanWireResourceOps) dead code on
the wire even though the arm has been there since P5f.
The bit is derived from g_resourceOpsAtStep2->SubDataResident, i.e. from the pointer this
function already pinned at step 2 and that step 5 already refuses to see swapped - never
from ActiveBackendType. That is ID-39's lesson and not a style preference: a mask is a
statement about THIS backend's registered table, and a bit derived from the enum would
keep claiming the capability for a build, a flavour or a future backend whose table does
not carry the arm.
`rsd=` joins the emit[] bracket on the PipeStats summary line, counted at the emitter once
per buffer_subdata_resident record rather than once per call, because a write past the
content chunk cap is cut into several records. It is the only observable that separates
the resident arm from the memcpy beside it: the bytes in the buffer are identical either
way, which is exactly how the capability stayed unpublished for a phase with every lane
green.
WHAT THIS DOES NOT YET PROVE, and R-6 is the reason rather than an omission. §5.4 asks for
a white-box case showing opcode 49 on the wire. None can exist at this tree: the resident
arm is reached only from a GPU-RESIDENT store, residency comes only from
AdoptPersistentMap, and every persistent-map acquisition declines under split by R-6
(PipeApply.cpp:2331 "A SPLIT BUILD RUNS AT TIER T2 AND DECLINES EVERY ACQUISITION,
ALWAYS"; T0/T1 are P11's and AdoptTierIsEmulate is a named Fatal for them). So the
capability is wired AHEAD of its consumer, deliberately, and `rsd=` is what will show the
records the day P11 lands a tier that adopts. Filed for the integrator in
notes/p7/magma-c.md.
What IS proved is both halves of the bit itself. RemoteClientTest's Magma bootstrap case
now asserts the published bit EQUALS `ops->SubDataResident != nullptr` - the two compared
to each other rather than both to true, so the case also covers a backend without the arm
on the day one exists - and a new CtWireScenario case reads the bit out of the client's
own caps mirror, through the same accessor the frontend reads, on both backends and all
three transports.
RED-ONCE, both levels. Deleting the OR reds
CapsMirrorTest.MagmaTransportPublishesRealBufferConsumersWithoutRunAhead
(RemoteClientTest.cpp:692, "Which is: false / Which is: true") and all SIX arms of
DirectGLES/DirectVulkan x {Split,Spawn,Tcp} Ct.TheServerPublishesTheResidentSubData
CapabilityFromItsOwnTable ("the client's caps mirror did not receive
kCapResidentSubData"). Restored: green.
Also carries the P4a death-helper comment from the previous commit's sweep: it no longer
says Magma installs no death table, because it now does and still frees no slot.
工作笔记（原 ~/w7/notes/）
这一层是 MGPipe 各阶段的工作笔记原件：包计划（BRIEF-*.md）、契约草稿、集成者逐条裁定
（INTEGRATOR-DECISIONS-*.md）、只读审计、普查、设备记录、包任务书（TASK-*.md）与阶段报告。
它们此前只存在于一台机器的 ~/w7/notes/ 下。上层那几份文档（ROADMAP.md、
CURRENT_STAGE_PROGRESS.md、MEASUREMENTS.md …）大量引用它们——裁定编号、审计行号、
逐门数字的出处几乎全在这里。一份引用了几百次、却只存在于本地未跟踪目录的记录，等于没有记录。
所以整体移进仓库。
路径映射
~/w7/notes/<phase>/<file>.md → docs/Disaggregated/notes/<phase>/<file>.md
上层文档里凡写作 ~/w7/notes/... 的 .md 引用，都按这条规则读。
移进来的是什么，没移的是什么
| 移进来了 | 全部 .md，415 份，约 11 MB，目录结构原样保留 |
| 没有移 | 脚本（.sh / .py）、运行日志（.log / .out / .err）、普查与门的结果数据（.json / .txt / .tsv）、补丁、APK 与 .idsig、nm 转储 |
没移的那些仍在 ~/w7/notes/ 与各构建树下。它们是证据数据而不是文档：体积大、随每次运行
重新产生、且多数只在产生它的那台机器上有意义（绝对路径、设备序列号、构建目录）。上层文档引用
它们时给的是路径，不是内容。
两个需要知道的例外
- P6 的包计划已提升为正式文档：原
~/w7/notes/p6/BRIEF-P6.md现在是../P6-SPAWN-PLAN.md，本目录不再保留副本，避免两份同源文档各自漂移。 契约草稿同理，见../P6-CONTRACT-DRAFT.md。 recovered/是从失败的 workflow 运行里捞回来的材料（wf1…wf5），与同名阶段目录 可能重复，保留是因为其中几份是当时唯一的完整版本。查阶段记录请先看阶段目录。
不受 citation lint 管
CI 的文档引用 lint 只吃 docs/Disaggregated/*.md（非递归，.github/workflows/test.yml），
本目录不在其中，这是有意的：这些笔记的 file:line 是写在各自当时的代码头上的，拿今天的
HEAD 去解析必然大面积失败，而那不是错误——那是它们作为历史记录的正确状态。要核对某份笔记的
引用，用它自己声明的那个 revision：
python3 scripts/check_doc_citations.py --rev <当时的头> docs/Disaggregated/notes/<phase>/<file>.md