mirror of
https://github.com/MobileGL-Dev/MobileGL
synced 2026-11-07 01:53:24 +09:00
swung0x48
1e2d076633
One reboot-clean session on Redmi 2f7cbe2e, copy-pasteable, with the shell each block runs in marked: pin and wake/Doze, APK install identity, P7-7 E0-E3, the P6.5 residual 39-case DirectGLES TCP golden matrix, the CTS $BASE for monolith x DirectVulkan, and the temp-environment restoration. Every step states in one line which result supports which hypothesis, and where the evidence is archived. Four things the runbook had to settle rather than restate: E1's proof. `running lockstep` is NOT the line that proves lockstep took effect: ClientSession.cpp:1873 guards it with `RunAhead != 0 && m_barrierArmed`, so it is the "the knob is set but the server lacks kCapRunAheadApply" warning and MOBILEGL_IPC_RUN_AHEAD=0 prints nothing at all from LatchRunAheadFromCaps. The proof is a line present and a line absent: `Config: IPC ... run-ahead=0 ...` (ConfigLoader.cpp:459) with zero `run-ahead ARMED` - the shape p5f/magma-runahead.md already recorded for the RA=0 arm. E1 will exit non-zero, by design. --transport inproc adds --require-inproc, whose gate demands run-ahead=1 in the Config: IPC line (trace-replay-ci.sh:601), and the proof runs AFTER result.json is pulled and checked. So the SSIM and the archive are usable and the arm is verified by hand against the table above; dropping the --env to make it green would delete the experiment. E0's budget. 39 cases x 2 transports x 3 repeats is 234 replays, roughly 3-4 h, which does not fit beside the TCP matrix and CTS in one window. It is split into a one-pass census that produces the divergent-case list and a three-repeat pass over that list plus two controls - the determinism question only has meaning for cases that already diverge. CTS is flagged, not promised. No caselist is in-tree, and the local VK-GL-CTS checkout has an empty external/openglcts/data with no mustpass file anywhere, so the five blocks cannot be cut in-tree; the exact pre-window procedure to fetch a tagged checkout and commit tools/cts/caselists/p7-*.txt is written out instead. And KHR-GL46 is unproven on the Android runner - every device reference result in the skill is KHR-GL33, the 4.5 numbers are desktop lavapipe, and the platform hands the package's version straight to eglCreateContext - so the runbook carries a five-minute pre-window probe and an explicit integrator decision: if 4.6 is unreachable the baseline is taken on KHR-GL33 and the AFTER reading must use the same version, because 0.5 pp between two different API versions means nothing.
工作笔记（原 ~/w7/notes/）
这一层是 MGPipe 各阶段的工作笔记原件：包计划（BRIEF-*.md）、契约草稿、集成者逐条裁定
（INTEGRATOR-DECISIONS-*.md）、只读审计、普查、设备记录、包任务书（TASK-*.md）与阶段报告。
它们此前只存在于一台机器的 ~/w7/notes/ 下。上层那几份文档（ROADMAP.md、
CURRENT_STAGE_PROGRESS.md、MEASUREMENTS.md …）大量引用它们——裁定编号、审计行号、
逐门数字的出处几乎全在这里。一份引用了几百次、却只存在于本地未跟踪目录的记录，等于没有记录。
所以整体移进仓库。
路径映射
~/w7/notes/<phase>/<file>.md → docs/Disaggregated/notes/<phase>/<file>.md
上层文档里凡写作 ~/w7/notes/... 的 .md 引用，都按这条规则读。
移进来的是什么，没移的是什么
| 移进来了 | 全部 .md，415 份，约 11 MB，目录结构原样保留 |
| 没有移 | 脚本（.sh / .py）、运行日志（.log / .out / .err）、普查与门的结果数据（.json / .txt / .tsv）、补丁、APK 与 .idsig、nm 转储 |
没移的那些仍在 ~/w7/notes/ 与各构建树下。它们是证据数据而不是文档：体积大、随每次运行
重新产生、且多数只在产生它的那台机器上有意义（绝对路径、设备序列号、构建目录）。上层文档引用
它们时给的是路径，不是内容。
两个需要知道的例外
- P6 的包计划已提升为正式文档：原
~/w7/notes/p6/BRIEF-P6.md现在是../P6-SPAWN-PLAN.md，本目录不再保留副本，避免两份同源文档各自漂移。 契约草稿同理，见../P6-CONTRACT-DRAFT.md。 recovered/是从失败的 workflow 运行里捞回来的材料（wf1…wf5），与同名阶段目录 可能重复，保留是因为其中几份是当时唯一的完整版本。查阶段记录请先看阶段目录。
不受 citation lint 管
CI 的文档引用 lint 只吃 docs/Disaggregated/*.md（非递归，.github/workflows/test.yml），
本目录不在其中，这是有意的：这些笔记的 file:line 是写在各自当时的代码头上的，拿今天的
HEAD 去解析必然大面积失败，而那不是错误——那是它们作为历史记录的正确状态。要核对某份笔记的
引用，用它自己声明的那个 revision：
python3 scripts/check_doc_citations.py --rev <当时的头> docs/Disaggregated/notes/<phase>/<file>.md