mirror of
https://github.com/MobileGL-Dev/MobileGL
synced 2026-11-07 10:03:23 +09:00
swung0x48andClaude Opus 5
785fed0b00
a6 is the read-only audit P6-SPAWN-PLAN puts first. Seven static items, each
produced by one auditor and re-resolved line by line by one adversarial
verifier; 198 rows, 65 of them contested, and only the surviving ones carry
into the report. Item 5 - can the server link without MG_Impl - is the one
experiment, and it is answered.
The headline is that P6's transport half is smaller than the plan assumed
(fc and fs really did land) and its process/role half is much larger. Four
statements in P6-SPAWN-PLAN / P6-CONTRACT-DRAFT are false at this head:
- `spawn` is not an observable state at all. ConfigLoader.cpp:339-346
recognises it and then writes Transport = Monolith, so "the child was
forced to monolith" and "the parent fell back" are the same value and
that named refusal cannot falsify itself. Meanwhile 226 live lines test
`Transport != Monolith` to select the SERVER arm, 148 of them in
MG_Backend - so ARCHITECTURE.md:488's rule, implemented literally, flips
the whole backend to frontend glue in the one process with no frontend.
- `cp` is not transport-only: the InitCapabilities REQUEST has no wire form,
and the codec refuses to encode the kind a live client still calls.
- the device-lost latch is not implemented; it was booked as carriage.
- the server cannot link without MG_Impl: 184 symbols, 177 of them real
function calls, owed 101 to P7 / 14 to P3b-P4b / 60 shared / 6 to P6.
There is also no module target to link, so the question could not have
been answered by editing a link line.
Four more blockers the earlier review missed: the apply thread aborts in
ConsumerDoorbell before popping its first record (contract 3.9's ruling, which
lk should retire rather than amend); neither side of the control plane is
wired to a socket; the control-reply wait has no deadline, so a frozen peer
wedges the GL thread inside eglMakeCurrent; and SurfaceReply cannot carry a
MobileGLResult, so a client cannot tell a dead server from a legitimate
refusal.
The abort census makes dl's funnel a redesign rather than a rename: 92 sites,
30 distinct family words against a 7-value wire enum, and three unbounded
peer-driven allocations with no try/catch anywhere under MG_Remote.
P6-ENDSTATE-REVIEW.md is the re-examination of P6 against the gfxstream-shaped
end state that produced a6's three added items. a6 overturned four of its own
claims - the MG_State eight's shape, the abort count, m_windowHandle's
injection points and a predicate name collision - and those are corrected in
place rather than left to be rediscovered.
Docs only. No code, no gate, no behaviour.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
工作笔记（原 ~/w7/notes/）
这一层是 MGPipe 各阶段的工作笔记原件：包计划（BRIEF-*.md）、契约草稿、集成者逐条裁定
（INTEGRATOR-DECISIONS-*.md）、只读审计、普查、设备记录、包任务书（TASK-*.md）与阶段报告。
它们此前只存在于一台机器的 ~/w7/notes/ 下。上层那几份文档（ROADMAP.md、
CURRENT_STAGE_PROGRESS.md、MEASUREMENTS.md …）大量引用它们——裁定编号、审计行号、
逐门数字的出处几乎全在这里。一份引用了几百次、却只存在于本地未跟踪目录的记录，等于没有记录。
所以整体移进仓库。
路径映射
~/w7/notes/<phase>/<file>.md → docs/Disaggregated/notes/<phase>/<file>.md
上层文档里凡写作 ~/w7/notes/... 的 .md 引用，都按这条规则读。
移进来的是什么，没移的是什么
| 移进来了 | 全部 .md，415 份，约 11 MB，目录结构原样保留 |
| 没有移 | 脚本（.sh / .py）、运行日志（.log / .out / .err）、普查与门的结果数据（.json / .txt / .tsv）、补丁、APK 与 .idsig、nm 转储 |
没移的那些仍在 ~/w7/notes/ 与各构建树下。它们是证据数据而不是文档：体积大、随每次运行
重新产生、且多数只在产生它的那台机器上有意义（绝对路径、设备序列号、构建目录）。上层文档引用
它们时给的是路径，不是内容。
两个需要知道的例外
- P6 的包计划已提升为正式文档：原
~/w7/notes/p6/BRIEF-P6.md现在是../P6-SPAWN-PLAN.md，本目录不再保留副本，避免两份同源文档各自漂移。 契约草稿同理，见../P6-CONTRACT-DRAFT.md。 recovered/是从失败的 workflow 运行里捞回来的材料（wf1…wf5），与同名阶段目录 可能重复，保留是因为其中几份是当时唯一的完整版本。查阶段记录请先看阶段目录。
不受 citation lint 管
CI 的文档引用 lint 只吃 docs/Disaggregated/*.md（非递归，.github/workflows/test.yml），
本目录不在其中，这是有意的：这些笔记的 file:line 是写在各自当时的代码头上的，拿今天的
HEAD 去解析必然大面积失败，而那不是错误——那是它们作为历史记录的正确状态。要核对某份笔记的
引用，用它自己声明的那个 revision：
python3 scripts/check_doc_citations.py --rev <当时的头> docs/Disaggregated/notes/<phase>/<file>.md